For many who are most familiar with evangelical expressions of Christianity, Penal Substitutionary Atonement (or PSA) is the only way they have heard the idea of the cross articulated. Like all metaphors, however, this law court image breaks if stretched too far.

In a recent video, I claimed that the foundational nature of God, above all other descriptors, is love. So in this video, let's talk about where that claim comes from by looking at the concept of the Trinity and then a very brief introduction to Process Theology and thought.

The framework for original sin that most of us are familiar with comes from a bad interpretation of a bad translation of one verse in one letter from Pual. Unfortunately, however, it has all kinds of implications for we think about ourselves and God. So let's talk about it.

As people deconstruct and reconstruct their faith in more progressive ways there are a few questions that keep coming up. They tend to be variations on three commons themes.

The gospels contain a few uncomfortable stories of demon possession. How do we read these stories as modern audiences? Should we accept them at a surface level? Do we chalk them up to ancient misunderstandings of mental health issues? Or can we explore to uncover the sophistication of ancient storytelling and look for the parables hidden in these texts?

This one is kinda nerdy and a little long but if you've heard the term The New Perspective on Paul you might be wondering what this is all about. So here's a quick breakdown of some of the major schools of interpretation when it comes to Paul and where the New Perspective fits.